If he had not noticed, is very unlikely in Italy pulls air strange for a while now.
On the one hand we are witnessing unprecedented all'intestardimento Republic of magazines like that every day, almost two months, continue to release small doses of a series of tests in ever new what is a mock battle on the far trench play against Berlusconi. Berlusconi against the husband (with statements of Veronica Lario), a man morally intact (with the case-Noemi and photos posted by Pais) and worthy of public office (with the grave-Mills case, the picture of sul'aereo Apicella and the state prosecutor's investigation of Bari). On the other witness to the eternal return of the routine concerns about the situation of freedom of the Italian press, aided by an unprecedented synchronized fury by the international press.
Someone brought exasperation may charge the degeneration of public debate on press freedom fully lived and poorly by certain bodies that are free to report on their pages private affairs between the Prime Minister and those aspiring showgirls and vacuous figures of characters in Sopranos-style Bagaglino-De Filippi.
Let's face it, news of the tissue that tells the umpteenth holiday at Villa Certosa, or only open a formal investigation umpteenth (and then closed at the start in favor of Berlusconi) everyone feels the temptation to close the newspaper, or at least pretend to close it.
So where is the risk of press freedom, since every day the newspapers are filled free of such slander?
The answer is quite simple: the problem lies elsewhere and is no longer invisible to distracted.
Like when essential is invisible to the eyes.
Yet there are at least two different kinds of facts that confirm a picture of alarm for freedom of information that fully responds to the projection by Freedom House launched on 1 May, the press in Italy is, at present, partly free.
0 comments:
Post a Comment