How To Stop A Friend From Seeing My Friends

THE LATEST NUCLEAR

NUCLEAR. 4 ideas for a green jackal

4 ideas on Nuclear:

a jackal are green, but the accounts I can do them.

The tragic reality forces us to discuss nuclear power, a few months after the referendum.

The Italian government wants to "keep going", but the populace we want to see clearly.

1) Nuclear power plants provide electricity. In Italy we do not need, in recent years the installed capacity has increased while demand has fallen: the question is of about 60 GW (gigawatts). The installed power in Italy in early 2010 amounted to 94 GW. So there is no real need for new electricity (for heating and transport we use oil or gas).

2) It is said that nuclear power plants we will ensure energy independence. False. The power plants use uranium as fuel. The major uranium mines in Australia and Africa are now under Chinese control, or Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, now under Russian control. So nuclear power is a source that creates dependence on China or Russia.

3) How much does the energy produced by power plants? Too. The cost of kWh (kilowatt hours) of nuclear power is greater than any other source (the costs of official cents dollar are: nuclear 10.2-wind: 9.9 - Coal: 9.8 - Gas: 8.2), this is because in addition to investments to build a power plant, one must also calculate the cost of smantellameto that may even raddoppiare.4) The Italian Government has provided four new nuclear plants at a cost of 30 billion lire. These 4 plants, if all goes well, would come into operation between 15-20 years, and would produce 5% of the country. And 'quite clear disproportion between the> and investment results. 5% is what you can get from now with a serious policy of energy saving and efficiency of existing plants.

4 takes these figures to demonstrate that nuclear power in Italy does not make sense and serves only to ensure a small business lobby. To this we add that the government is proposing nuclear power without having made the country a serious energy plan (requirements, weather, fuel consumption, costs, etc.). And that the problem of radioactive waste has not yet been risolto.La conclusion is simple, and it is the same many years ago: Nuclear energy? No, thanks.

Mao Valpiana

Kate's Playground Name

JAPAN falls on those who want the myth of nuclear Bepi Papazzoni

JAPAN

falls on the myth of those who want nuclear power.

When you have had to argue why you should avoid installing nuclear power stations in a seismic area which is Italy, have come up nuclearists always taking as example the Japan, very seismic area but that is the site of numerous nuclear power plants there by those who took the responsibilities of government and decision-making.
goes without saying that in that country by an anti-nuclear movement among the busiest in the world.
The fact is that the last reason was considered as support available for those who want nuclear power in Italy has fallen.
E 'before the eyes of all, beyond the terrible tragedy due to seismic upheaval, including the tremendous danger posed by nuclear power plants.
are in memory of all the nuclear disaster in the United States than in Europe and the continuing incidents that are often covered by speculative quell'omertà of those who earn substantial income collected, but lacked the Asian continent and in this case the symbol of the nation's nuclear option .
And now, when now the doubts about the goodness of the nuclear option are beset almost all states that at best prevent the installation of new power plants, here in Italy against the push to build power stations on its territory.
The reason is clear: as the builders of plants are not able to install other countries here in Italy the opportunity, perhaps spraying the decision-makers with appropriate monetary oils.
Only recently, we faced an earthquake in central Italy, although even that was not the same intensity as that of Japan which resulted in death and disaster, try to think of a single earthquake, perhaps in proximity to a nuclear plant that had caused the 'radiation emissions equal to those Japanese who would have here in Italy, could feel safe?
But, despite everything, he insists on these decisions and it does not matter if the President of our region say that here there is no room for these sites, but votes for the nuclear option, so it is in Porto Tolle, or Brescia in Friuli or (even worse) with the winds that circulate on the peninsula is the danger How to get it out of the door.
But ask yourself why the presidency of the control of nuclear energy have brought one of the largest Italian oncologists, the message is clear: "Gentlemen, there is enough food for all" for those who cause diseases due to radiation and those who care.
Faced with this apocalyptic scenario is a further step: the government with an Executive Order has effectively blocked up to another future decree, incentives for renewable energy sources. The message is equally clear: people must not understand that energy is everyone's heritage and not the few.
One thing for all to think: if it were covered with photovoltaic panels on 10% of the surface of the roofs of the houses would be the Italian's total energy needs of the nation.
But it's so difficult to understand that health is the primary asset of a nation?

of Bepi Papazzoni